AI copilot, designed for teacher work
Lerarius supports concrete teacher work: report writing, lesson preparation, differentiation, parent conversations and class follow-up. Every suggestion shows which school information was used.
What breaks today
A blank AI chat makes teachers explain the full context every time. The result can sound convincing without making clear what it is based on.
How Learovia fixes it
The teacher chooses a familiar task and the relevant class, student or assignment. Lerarius drafts from selected school information and keeps the sources visible. It never publishes automatically.
Source-grounded workflow
- The teacher chooses a task and the class, student, assignment or period it concerns.
- Learovia shows in advance which information will be used, such as attendance, learning evidence and open work.
- The assistant creates a first draft without adding names or figures outside the selected information.
- Sources remain visible beside the proposed text.
- The teacher edits, accepts or rejects the suggestion.
- Only after that decision can the text move into a report, message or lesson plan.
Source-grounding as professional duty
A teacher writing a report phrase about a student is professionally accountable for what it says. A report phrase from an AI without source citation cannot be professionally endorsed. By linking every Lerarius response to its source data, the teacher remains the final authority — the AI does only the typing work, not the judgement.